In this article, we will be discussing what I term digital evidence and other things about it. This will be lengthened one subsequent to the other. The question is, what gave ascend or brought about the necessitate for digital evidence in a court proceeding? Before the end of this work, we will see the importance of digital evidence.

Digital evidence
Digital evidence


Digital evidence or electronic proof is any probative message that is saved or transmitted in a digital outward appearance that a party to a court case may depend on or use during the trial. Previous to accepting digital evidence in a lawful proceeding, a court will establish so important things which include: if the evidence is pertinent, whether it is genuine if it is tittle-tattle and whether a copy is satisfactory or the original is compulsory. These factors must be put into serious consideration when digital evidence is in question.

Now it is very important that we note that the use of digital evidence has augmented in the precedent few decades as courts have now accepted the use of a lot of digital evidences which ranges from the likes of e-mail , digital photograph, ATM operation logs, word processing papers, instantaneous message histories, files saved from secretarial programs, spreadsheet , internet browser history, database, the contents of computer reminiscence , PC backups, laptop printouts, comprehensive Positioning System tracks, logs that are from a hotel’s electronic door locks, and digital capture or audio files and other significant and forms of digital evidence.

Still, on the issue of digital evidence, there are several reasons why it will be permissible or may be unacceptable. Digital proof tends to be more capacious, more easily said than done to destroy, easily customized, effortlessly duplicated, potentially more communicative, along with being more readily obtainable. As an effect of this, some courts find it rigid to acknowledge digital confirmation during court proceedings.




I will like you to take note of this feature that can decide the permissibility of electronic evidence in a court action which is that digital evidence is often ruled precluded by courts for the reason that it was obtained devoid of endorsement. In good number jurisdictions, a warrant is necessary to confiscate and investigate digital devices. If that digital evidence was gotten devoid of consent, the court may not acknowledge it. That is why a number of times, most individuals are frightened to tender a shred of digital evidence in a court proceeding for the reason that it was gotten without sanction.

As with any evidence, the supporter of electronic evidence must lay a suitable establishment. That is to say that the digital proof been offered must have a rock-hard and tangible foundation which is well linked to the case in question. Courts largely fretful themselves with the dependability of such electronic evidence. Reliability in the sense that it should be proof which the court can rely on at any point in time. Relying on is that the electronic evidence will be something that can’t be altered as I mentioned over.

I will like to end on this note, there is an issue surrounding the uniqueness of the digital proof, saying that it has been written out and consequently it might have been distorted and therefore it is not novel. But am sorry to dishearten you for the reason that the “Federal Rules of Evidence” rule 1001(3) states “if data are saved in a computer…, any printout or supplementary output comprehensible by vision, shown to replicate the data precisely, is an ‘original.’” This basically makes digital evidence unique no matter the form which it is been offered by. An emblematic example is a question if printing some documents, “the PC printout does not infringe the best evidence rule, for the reason that a computer printout is well thought-out an ‘original.’”





Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply